"A few years ago I read a number of books on Multiple Personality Disorder, language acquisition, and recovered memory. And during this time, I considered (as I did before and still do, which is not to say "conclude") that one might no longer be writing a poem addressed to one person (Rilke's angel) out there. Rather, it might be that one is trying to write a poem addressed to all the voices (manifestations) one hears in one's head. Or maybe, and here I am thinking of Jack Spicer, one is trying to register their different tonal registers, the range of sounds they make, the inchoate emotions. In a taped conversation of Stan and Jane Brakhage and Hollis Frampton (avant garde filmmakers), Frampton says this about the well-known image of St. George slaying the dragon: "The dragon has often been emblematic of what is
unwarranted and surprising, and thus undesirable, in perception and imagination." Stan's response speaks, I think, to the question you've raised. He proposes that Sergei Eisenstein made the "mass of people" into "the hero," and that until then they existed in history as a "pretty ugly apparition." Baudelaire would agree. The other dilemma the artist faces is "to find a way to make manifest to the general air [one's] own socially unacceptable particularities." --John Yau, in a Q & A from Rain Taxi, Fall 2006
2 comments:
Whoa, this is good. I like trying on the concept all human creative expression is a force for one's self/Self awareness.
Must be the solipsist in me.
(smile)
What's not a mirror...teacher, eh?
I would agree with that concept-- art being both empowering and liberating, regardless if its the appreciator or the creator. Although, one can become sort of an addict for the arts, but that seems to be a fairly benign addiction.
Solipsism? Funny you mention because I've been reading Robert Creeley lately and thinking about how this can be found in his poetry at times. Not sure how I feel about it quite yet.
Post a Comment