The Wild Palms (If I Forget Thee, Jerusalem); William Faulkner, 1939
Two stories separated by time and characters, but sharing similar themes and locale, including the legendary Parchman State Prison in Mississippi. The first, with Old Testament and more ‘earthly’ overtones, takes place during the Mississippi floods of 1927 when levees broke along the swollen Mississippi River and flooded the countryside. Prisoners of Parchman had to be relocated to dry ground, including an inmate of American Indian origins doing 15 for an attempted bank robbery modeled after the pulp books and comics he had read during his youth. During the relocation he was asked to take a rowboat to rescue a stranded man and pregnant women, which resulted in his being swept up in the wild currents with the woman as his passenger. Through the descriptions of their journey Faulkner demonstrates the inevitability of the natural and social forces, to which the prisoner exhibits a stoic, quiet acceptance towards, keeping himself in agreement to his personal fate. While he does return to prison in the end, his story includes the delivery of the pregnant woman's baby.
The second story occurs about 10 years later and contains nuances of the New Testament and explores the more ‘cerebral’ qualities of our existence. A young man, Harry, with fairly upstanding social and intellectual gifts, falls in love with a married woman, Charlotte, when finishing up his residency to become a physician. Charlotte reciprocates the love equally and leaves her husband and children to be with Harry, but by doing so they form a relationship which the rest of society would consider ‘illicit’, thereby removing them from society‘s privileges. However, each considers their love to be so strong that it is all they need in life, all else being capable of going to the wayside provided that they have their love for one another, and by choosing a life of the immaterial, they also reject the more prevalent values of materialism and prestige. In doing so, Harry displays his free will (last name Willbourne), believing that he is in charge of his own fate, and in contrast to the first, his story results not in birth, but an aborted pregnancy which he personally performs. When arrested for his actions, he’s presented with the opportunity to flee, but, as with the prisoner, resigns and accepts the charges against him. In the end, as with the first, an acceptance of his fate is made.
The comparisons and contrasts of the two stories are so abundant, they become an endless source of rumination: the balance of freewill and fate, birth and death, natural forces, social constructs, individuality, moral choice versus societal demands. In fact, the Trappist monk Thomas Merton was noted to indicate that he and fellows monks would use Faulkner’s novel to meditate upon the human condition. Not that The Wild Palms could be considered religious allegory, but its themes contain the eternal truths of humankind which make for the non-faith substance within religious thought.
If the depth of themes don’t appeal, the book is as equally immense in its artistic merits. I have not read a lot of Faulkner, but of that which I have read (primarily some of his short stories and As I Lay Dying) I don’t remember his writing being as ornate and stylized as it is, which tells me I need to read a lot more Faulkner. The stream of consciousness reaches a descriptiveness that will ever change the way you see a shopping mall in Chicago, or conceptualize the muddy waters of an over flown Mississippi, and it makes for a reading that’s powerful in both its vividness and immediacy.
The second story occurs about 10 years later and contains nuances of the New Testament and explores the more ‘cerebral’ qualities of our existence. A young man, Harry, with fairly upstanding social and intellectual gifts, falls in love with a married woman, Charlotte, when finishing up his residency to become a physician. Charlotte reciprocates the love equally and leaves her husband and children to be with Harry, but by doing so they form a relationship which the rest of society would consider ‘illicit’, thereby removing them from society‘s privileges. However, each considers their love to be so strong that it is all they need in life, all else being capable of going to the wayside provided that they have their love for one another, and by choosing a life of the immaterial, they also reject the more prevalent values of materialism and prestige. In doing so, Harry displays his free will (last name Willbourne), believing that he is in charge of his own fate, and in contrast to the first, his story results not in birth, but an aborted pregnancy which he personally performs. When arrested for his actions, he’s presented with the opportunity to flee, but, as with the prisoner, resigns and accepts the charges against him. In the end, as with the first, an acceptance of his fate is made.
The comparisons and contrasts of the two stories are so abundant, they become an endless source of rumination: the balance of freewill and fate, birth and death, natural forces, social constructs, individuality, moral choice versus societal demands. In fact, the Trappist monk Thomas Merton was noted to indicate that he and fellows monks would use Faulkner’s novel to meditate upon the human condition. Not that The Wild Palms could be considered religious allegory, but its themes contain the eternal truths of humankind which make for the non-faith substance within religious thought.
If the depth of themes don’t appeal, the book is as equally immense in its artistic merits. I have not read a lot of Faulkner, but of that which I have read (primarily some of his short stories and As I Lay Dying) I don’t remember his writing being as ornate and stylized as it is, which tells me I need to read a lot more Faulkner. The stream of consciousness reaches a descriptiveness that will ever change the way you see a shopping mall in Chicago, or conceptualize the muddy waters of an over flown Mississippi, and it makes for a reading that’s powerful in both its vividness and immediacy.






